Search found 11 matches

by jmueller
Mon Apr 06, 2020 12:49 am
Forum: trouble-shooting
Topic: error (72) floating overflow
Replies: 10
Views: 2926

Re: error (72) floating overflow

Ralph, Thanks for sending the updated version. It appears to be running the input file without errors; however, there is a discrepancy between the simulation when ran on the parallel version of MICRESS 6.406 on linux and serial MICRESS 6.4 on Windows. The simulation appears to generate nucleation ev...
by jmueller
Tue Mar 31, 2020 9:59 pm
Forum: trouble-shooting
Topic: error (72) floating overflow
Replies: 10
Views: 2926

Re: error (72) floating overflow

We've tried some more troubleshooting; here's where were at: The input file seems to run fine on our Windows machines (serial version of MICRESS 6.400) regardless of where/what OS the GES file was made. The input file always causes this same error on our linux HPC machine (parallel version of MICRES...
by jmueller
Fri Mar 27, 2020 6:32 pm
Forum: trouble-shooting
Topic: error (72) floating overflow
Replies: 10
Views: 2926

Re: error (72) floating overflow

Thank you for looking into this, Bernd. I don't have any issues when I run this simulation on my desktop either, only when I use the parallel version. This particular simulation isn't exactly the concern as far as reducing simulation time via parallelization, but I have other simulations planned tha...
by jmueller
Wed Mar 25, 2020 4:20 pm
Forum: trouble-shooting
Topic: error (72) floating overflow
Replies: 10
Views: 2926

Re: error (72) floating overflow

Thank you, Bernd for the advice. However, I've tried troubleshooting, and I have not been able to avoid the error. I checked the .diff output; the diffusion data had been updated for the two time-steps, however the value of the activation energy is zero for all elements/gradients. Also, this was the...
by jmueller
Mon Mar 23, 2020 9:38 pm
Forum: trouble-shooting
Topic: error (72) floating overflow
Replies: 10
Views: 2926

error (72) floating overflow

Trying to run a simulation in the parallel version of MICRESS, but it doesn't make it past the first timestep. I don't know what this error is means or is referring to, so I'm not sure how to address it. Thanks for any help, Josh The following is the output and error upon starting the simulation: Re...
by jmueller
Mon Mar 23, 2020 4:57 pm
Forum: trouble-shooting
Topic: Issues running simulations in parallel version
Replies: 8
Views: 1996

Re: Issues running simulations in parallel version

Thanks, Ralph. I'll take a look into getting 6.4 installed on our parallel machine. I'm intending to run simulations with simultaneous interstitial and substitutional solute partitioning. On my desktop, these these types of simulations would always slow down substantially after the nucleation of the...
by jmueller
Mon Mar 23, 2020 2:45 pm
Forum: trouble-shooting
Topic: Issues running simulations in parallel version
Replies: 8
Views: 1996

Re: Issues running simulations in parallel version

Thanks for looking into this, Ralph. I use 6.4 on my desktop. I'm not sure why we have 6.2 for our parallel version. We just had our license updated so that we could run a linux version of MICRESS in parallel on a supercomputer. Is it possible we received the wrong version when we updated our licens...
by jmueller
Fri Mar 20, 2020 3:37 pm
Forum: trouble-shooting
Topic: Issues running simulations in parallel version
Replies: 8
Views: 1996

Issues running simulations in parallel version

Hello, Recently I've started to run simulations on the parallel version of MICRESS in hopes to speed up the diffusion calculations and reduce overall simulation time. I am able to run and complete simulations, but they are not completing as expected. The first issue I have is that I apparently canno...
by jmueller
Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:56 am
Forum: solid-solid phase transformations
Topic: Average Composition Conservation
Replies: 1
Views: 1314

Average Composition Conservation

I'm simulating the nucleation and growth of a solid phase at grain boundaries in a solid matrix. The nucleating phase is expected to grow with an enriched composition that is partitioned from the matrix. I've noticed that the 'average concentration' of the partitioning component increases quite subs...
by jmueller
Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:21 pm
Forum: solid-solid phase transformations
Topic: GES5 Issue
Replies: 2
Views: 1703

Re: GES5 Issue

That was an easy fix.

Thank you Deepu!