Interfacial energy & mobility in anisotropic model
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2025 11:38 pm
Dear Bernd,
I have a question about how to determine interfacial energy and mobility in an anisotropic model.
In an anisotropic model, interfacial energy and mobility can be defined in two ways:
One is the "low-angle misorientation" function (based on the Read-Shockley and Humphreys law), and the other is the "anisotropy" function (as shown in Table 4 at the following URL):
https://docs.micress.de/7.3/micress/top ... anisotropy
For example, both functions are defined in the following code.
When the misorientation between grains is smaller than the low angle limit (in this case, 15 degrees), which function ("low-angle misorientation" or "anisotropy") is actually used to determine the interfacial energy and mobility?
# Shall misorientation be considered?
# Options: misorientation no_misorientation
# [low_angle_limit <degrees (default=15)>] [special_orient <nb>]
misorientation low_angle_limit 15
# Input of the misorientation coefficients:
# Modification of interfacial energy for low angle boundaries
# Options: factor read-shockley
read-shockley
# Modification of the mobility for low angle boundaries
# Options: {factor | humphreys [<minimum> <parameter B> <parameter N>]}
# (default: minimum=0.05 B=5.0 N=4.0)
humphreys
# Is interaction isotropic?
# Options: isotropic
# anisotropic [junction_force] [harmonic_expansion]
anisotropic
# This anisotropic interaction is not yet implemented.
# Instead: isotropic-metallic
# Anisotropy of interfacial stiffness? (cubic)
# 1 - delta * cos(4*phi), (delta =delta_stiffness =15*delta_energy)
# Coefficient delta (<1.) ?
0.1000000000000
# Anisotropy of interfacial mobility? (cubic)
# 1 + delta * cos(4*phi)
# Coefficient delta (<1.) ?
0.1000000000000
Best regards,
Chika
I have a question about how to determine interfacial energy and mobility in an anisotropic model.
In an anisotropic model, interfacial energy and mobility can be defined in two ways:
One is the "low-angle misorientation" function (based on the Read-Shockley and Humphreys law), and the other is the "anisotropy" function (as shown in Table 4 at the following URL):
https://docs.micress.de/7.3/micress/top ... anisotropy
For example, both functions are defined in the following code.
When the misorientation between grains is smaller than the low angle limit (in this case, 15 degrees), which function ("low-angle misorientation" or "anisotropy") is actually used to determine the interfacial energy and mobility?
# Shall misorientation be considered?
# Options: misorientation no_misorientation
# [low_angle_limit <degrees (default=15)>] [special_orient <nb>]
misorientation low_angle_limit 15
# Input of the misorientation coefficients:
# Modification of interfacial energy for low angle boundaries
# Options: factor read-shockley
read-shockley
# Modification of the mobility for low angle boundaries
# Options: {factor | humphreys [<minimum> <parameter B> <parameter N>]}
# (default: minimum=0.05 B=5.0 N=4.0)
humphreys
# Is interaction isotropic?
# Options: isotropic
# anisotropic [junction_force] [harmonic_expansion]
anisotropic
# This anisotropic interaction is not yet implemented.
# Instead: isotropic-metallic
# Anisotropy of interfacial stiffness? (cubic)
# 1 - delta * cos(4*phi), (delta =delta_stiffness =15*delta_energy)
# Coefficient delta (<1.) ?
0.1000000000000
# Anisotropy of interfacial mobility? (cubic)
# 1 + delta * cos(4*phi)
# Coefficient delta (<1.) ?
0.1000000000000
Best regards,
Chika