Parameter optimization of CET simulation in arc weld
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2026 12:03 pm
Dear Bernd,
Hello, this is Hee-Eun Kim.
I am currently attempting to simulate the columnar-to-equiaxed transition (CET) behavior in the arc weld of the CMSX-4 alloy. Based on discussions on the MICRESS forum indicating that the nucleation density model better reflects the physical mechanism, I used the default seed_density model without the lognormal option. The nucleation classes were defined to generate a total of ten classes.
Since the actual weld depth is 0.686 mm, I set the geometry z-axis to 1000 µm. Accordingly, the temperature profile along the z-axis as a function of time in the process conditions was also defined over a total depth of 0.1 cm.
When I first ran the simulation, liquid phase appeared even though the temperature was around 300 K. To resolve this, I modified the initial microstructure so that the entire z-domain started as a disordered FCC phase. However, after this modification, liquid no longer formed even when the temperature increased to 1900 K. I would appreciate your advice on this issue.
In addition, since the mushy zone of CMSX-4 is approximately between 1400 K and 1700 K, I set the nucleation temperature range within this interval. Would this be appropriate? I would also appreciate your advice on the nucleation parameters.
I have attached the dri file and the thermal history file for your reference.
Thank you always for your help.
Best regards,
Hee-Eun Kim
Hello, this is Hee-Eun Kim.
I am currently attempting to simulate the columnar-to-equiaxed transition (CET) behavior in the arc weld of the CMSX-4 alloy. Based on discussions on the MICRESS forum indicating that the nucleation density model better reflects the physical mechanism, I used the default seed_density model without the lognormal option. The nucleation classes were defined to generate a total of ten classes.
Since the actual weld depth is 0.686 mm, I set the geometry z-axis to 1000 µm. Accordingly, the temperature profile along the z-axis as a function of time in the process conditions was also defined over a total depth of 0.1 cm.
When I first ran the simulation, liquid phase appeared even though the temperature was around 300 K. To resolve this, I modified the initial microstructure so that the entire z-domain started as a disordered FCC phase. However, after this modification, liquid no longer formed even when the temperature increased to 1900 K. I would appreciate your advice on this issue.
In addition, since the mushy zone of CMSX-4 is approximately between 1400 K and 1700 K, I set the nucleation temperature range within this interval. Would this be appropriate? I would also appreciate your advice on the nucleation parameters.
I have attached the dri file and the thermal history file for your reference.
Thank you always for your help.
Best regards,
Hee-Eun Kim