solid-state phase transformation

solid-solid phase transformations, influence of stresses and strains
Post Reply
zelin zhang
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2026 2:36 am
anti_bot: 333

solid-state phase transformation

Post by zelin zhang » Wed Apr 08, 2026 4:58 am

Dear Bernd,

I would like to ask for your help regarding a problem I encountered in MICRESS during pearlite transformation simulations.

In my simulations, the pearlite transformation behaves normally when stress coupling is not considered. The lamellar structure forms correctly and remains stable throughout the simulation.

However, after enabling stress coupling, I observe a different behavior:

In the early stage, the microstructure evolution is still reasonable, and the pearlite lamellae form as expected.
In the later stage, the cementite lamellae become unstable. They tend to break, merge, or become distorted, leading to abnormal pearlite morphology.

I have also tried to adjust the interface properties between ferrite and cementite. Specifically, I reduced the interface mobility and increased the interface energy between these two phases. However, these modifications did not resolve the issue, and the instability of cementite lamellae in the later stage still persists.

I would like to ask how this problem could be addressed, and whether there are recommended strategies to improve the stability of cementite lamellae under stress coupling.

Any advice or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you very much for your help.

Best regards,
Zelin Zhang
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Bernd
Posts: 1627
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:29 pm

Re: solid-state phase transformation

Post by Bernd » Wed Apr 08, 2026 11:59 am

Dear Zelin Zhang,

This is difficult to say without having more details on the simulation and the type of instability. The molar volumes of the phases as well as the stress boundary conditions have the most strong impact on the mechanical coupling. However, other settings may also have an influence and trigger such a behaviour.

The next steps should be to find out how the instabilities play out exactly. Are they only connected to the elastic driving force (.dGsp-output)? Is this effect realistic with respect to its relative strength? Or is there also some impact of stress on the concentration distribution in the phases, which may indirectly lead to instabilities?

If you get stuck with this problem, you may send your input file (including all required input so that I can try to reproduce the described behaviour).

Bernd

zelin zhang
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2026 2:36 am
anti_bot: 333

Re: solid-state phase transformation

Post by zelin zhang » Wed Apr 08, 2026 3:03 pm

Dear Bernd,

I will send you the driving file via private message, and I would be very grateful if you could take a look and help me with this issue.

Thank you very much for your help.

Best regards,
Zelin Zhang

Bernd
Posts: 1627
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:29 pm

Re: solid-state phase transformation

Post by Bernd » Thu Apr 09, 2026 1:02 pm

Dear Zelin Zhang,

Thanks for sending your input file. But for running your input file I also need the .ges5-file (FeC_ALL.ges5)...

Bernd

Post Reply